Fiziol. rast. genet. 2020, vol. 52, no. 3, 187-195, doi:

Physiological peculiarities of sunflower boron nutrition

Morgun V.V.1, Cakmak І.2, Schwartau V.V.1, Mykhalska L.M.1

  1. Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 31/17 Vasylkivska St., Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine
  2. Faculty of Engineering & Natural Sciences, Sabanci University 34956, Tuzla, Istanbul, Turkey

Although the importance of plant nutrition with boron was established almost a hundred years ago, the physiological peculiarities of its activity continue to be among the discussed. The boric fertilizers market in Ukraine is overloaded by advertising propositions and there are practically limited results of correct boron nutrition efficiency determination. Traditionally, since the early 1990s, the focus on plant nutrition in Ukraine has been given to nitrogen. However, low levels of nitrogen utilization by crops indicate that information on the physiological me­chanisms of cultivated plants nutrition is not enough. And, practically, the issues of cultivated plants nutrition by other important elements, first of all — boron, remain out of focus. In Ukraine, areas under boron-dependent crops exceed 10 million hectares: sunflower, winter and spring rapeseed, sugar beets, potatoes, etc. Boron in nutrition systems is also required on soybean, cereals and maize. Cultivated plant’s boron deficiency is observed in all soil and climatic zones of Ukraine. The aim of this research was to explore promising for Ukraine form of boron mineral fertilizers for sunflower nutrition, a culture that occupies the largest area in the country among all and boron-sensitive crops. Studies have shown that use of boron fertilizers in crop production of Ukraine is important for improving the productivity of boron-sensitive crops, mainly sunflower, and the basic introduction of slowly soluble boric fertilizer (Colemanite, Ulexite, etc) into the soil will significantly reduce seedling damage from phytotoxic effects of boron and increase productivity of boron-sensitive cultivated plants.

Keywords: boron, sunflower, yield, phytotoxicity

Fiziol. rast. genet.
2020, vol. 52, no. 3, 187-195

Full text and supplemented materials

Free full text: PDF  


1. Warington, K. (1923). The effect of boric acid and borax on the broad been and certain other plants. Ann Bot., 37, 4, pp. 629-672.

2. Marschner, H. (2012). Marschner's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. London: Academic Press.

3. Lemarchand, D., Gaillardet, J., Lewin, E. & Allegre C.J. (2000). The influence of rivers on marine boron isotopes and implications for reconstructing past ocean pH. Nature 408 (6815), 951-954.

4. Gupta U.C. (1993). Factors affecting boron uptake by plants. In: Gupta UC, ed. Boron and its role in crop production Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc., 87-104.

5. National Soil Fertility Report, 2010. 2013/07/stan_gruntiv.pdf

6. Cakmak, I. & Romheld, V. (1997). Boron deficiency-induced impairments of cellular functions in plants. Plant Soil, 193, pp. 71-83.

7. Dear, B.S. & Weir, R.G. (2004). Boron deficiency in pastures and field crops. New South Wales Department of Agriculture Agfacts, P1.AC.1, 2nd Ed. pp. 1-8.

8. Putoczki, T., Gerrard, J. & Jackson, S. (2007). Physiology and Metabalism of Boron in Plants. In: XU F. Goldbach, H., Brown, P.H., Bell, R.W., Fujiwara, T., Hunt, C.D., Goldberg, S., Shi, L. (eds). Advances in Plant and Animal Boron Nutrition. Springer: Dordrecht.

9. Diehn, T.A., Bienert, M.D., Pommerrenig, B., Liu, Z., Spitzer, C., Bernhardt, N., Fuge, J., Bieber, A., Richet, N., Chaumont, F. & Bienert, G.P. (2019). Boron demanding tissues of Brassica napus express specific sets of functional Nodulin26-like Intrinsic Proteins and BOR1 transporters. Plant J., 100, pp. 68-82.

10. WHO (World Health Organization) (1998). Environmental health criteria 204: Boron. International programme on chemical safety, Geneva, Switzerland.

11. Kabu, Mustafa & Akosman, Murat. (2013). Biological Effects of Boron. Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology, 225, pp. 57-75.

12. Bolanos, L., Lukaszewski, K., Bonilla, I. & Blevins, D. (2004). Why boron? Plant Physiology and Biochemistry., 42, 11, pp. 907-912.

13. Brown, P.H., Bellaloui, N., Wimmer, M.A., Bassil, E.S., Ruiz, J., Hu, H., Pfeffer, H., Dannel, F. & Romheld, V. (2008). Boron in plant biology. Plant Biol., 4 (2), pp. 205-223.

14. Moing, A, Carbonne, F, Rashad, M.H. & Gaudilere, J.P. (1992). Carbon fluxes in mature peach leaves. Plant Physiology, 100, pp. 1878-1884.

15. Nielsen, F.H. & Meacham, S.L. (2011). Growing evidence for human health benefits of boron. J. Evid. Based Integr. Medicine, 16, pp. 169-180.

16. Shaaban, M.M. (2010). Role of Boron in Plant Nutrition and Human Health. American J. Plant Physiol., 5, 5, pp. 224-240.

17. Waqar, A., Niaz, A, Kanwal, S. & Khalid, M. (2009). Role of boron in plant growth: a review. J. Agricult. Res., 47 (3), pp. 329-338.

18. Landi, M., Margaritopoulou, Th., Papadakis, I.E. & Araniti, F. (2019). Boron toxicity in higher plants: an update. Planta, 250, pp. 1011-1032.

19. Blevins, D.J. & Lukaszewski, K.M. (1998). Boron in plant structure and function. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 49, pp. 481-500.

20. Reid, R. (2014). Understanding the boron transport network in plants. Plant Soil, 385 (1-2), pp. 1-13.

21. Princi, M.P., Lupini, A., Araniti, F., Longo, C., Mauceri, A., Sunseri, F. & Abenavoli, M.R. (2016). Boron toxicity and tolerance in plants: recent advances and future perspectives. Plant Metal Interaction. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 115-147.

22. Will, S., Eichert, T., Fernandez, V., Mohring, J., Muller, T. & Romheld, V. (2011). Absorption and mobility of foliar-applied boron in soybean as affected by plant boron status and application as a polyol complex. Plant Soil, 344 (1-2), pp. 283-293.