Fiziol. rast. genet. 2020, vol. 52, no. 4, 295-305, doi:

Electron and proton transport in chloroplasts of pea plants after night exposures to chilling temperatures

Polishchuk A.V., Podorvanov V.V., Zolotareva E.K.

  • M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2 Tereshchenkivska St., Kyiv, 01004, Ukraine

Plant growth and development slow down when the temperature drops below a critical level (10—12 °C). One of the main mechanisms of plant adaptation to lower temperatures is an increase in the fluidity of the lipid phase of the membranes, which makes it possible to maintain the necessary membrane processes for survival, in particular, the activity of photosynthetic electron transport. In the temperate climate zone, plants often tolerate nighttime temperature drops to frost. Pea (Pisum sativum L.) refers to cold-resistant species that can withstand a prolonged decrease in temperature. In this work, pea plants were grown at a constant temperature of 20—22 °C for 11 days, then for 6 days at night, the plants were placed in chambers at a temperature of 6 °C. The temperature dependence of the photochemical activity in chloroplasts isolated from control and chilled leaves was studied. It was shown that the maximum value of the rate of uncoupled electron transport from water to potassium ferricyanide in control chloroplasts was observed at a temperature of 22 °C, i.e. at the temperature of plant growth. In the chloroplasts of plants subjected to night cooling, the temperature dependence of the uncoupled electron transport was shifted to lower temperatures and the maximum reaction rate was recorded at a temperature of about 12 °C. When measuring the value of light-induced proton uptake (DН+) and the rate of O2 uptake in the reaction of electron transfer from H2O to methyl viologen in coupled chloroplasts, a sharp decrease in these parameters was observed with a change in the temperature of the reaction medium from 14 to 10 °C in the control, and from 10 to 6 °C in the experimental plants. The sharp decrease in the rate of photochemical reactions with decreasing temperature may be due to a phase transition of membrane lipids and a slowing down of diffuse processes. These results allow us to consider the DН+ as an indicator of the fluidity of the lipid phase of chloroplast membranes in comparative studies. The transmembrane proton gradient (DрН), which was estimated by light-dependent quenching of the fluorescent label of 9-aminoacridine, exceeded the control level in chloroplasts of plants subjected to night cooling, which may be due to an improvement in the insulating function of the membranes. The data obtained indicate that when pea plants adapt to lower night temperatures, the state of the photosynthetic chloroplast membranes changes, which ensures the preservation of their functional activity.

Keywords: Pisum sativum L., photosynthesis, chloroplasts, chilling, electron transport, low temperature adaptation, plastoquinone, proton exchange, transmembrane proton gradient

Fiziol. rast. genet.
2020, vol. 52, no. 4, 295-305

Full text and supplemented materials

Free full text: PDF  


1. Bhandari, K. (2018). Chilling stress: how it affects the plants and its alleviation strategies. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res., 9 (6), pp. 2197-2200.

2. Chen, L.J., Xiang, H.Z., Miao, Y., Zhang, L., Guo, Z. F., Zhao, X.H., X.-H., Lin, J.-W. & Li, T.L. (2014). An overview of cold resistance in plants. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 200 (4), pp. 237-245.

3. Yamori, W., Hikosaka, K. & Way, D.A. (2014). Temperature response of photosynthesis in C-3, C-4, and CAM plants: Temperature acclimation and temperature adaptation. Photosynthesis Research, 119, pp. 101-117.

4. Bilyavska, N.O., Fediuk, O.M. & Zolotareva, E.K. (2019). Chloroplasts of cold-tolerant plants. Plant Sci. Today. 6 (4). pp. 407-411.

5. Liu, X., Zhou, Y., Xiao, J. & Bao, F. (2018). Effects of chilling on the structure, function and development of chloroplasts. Front. plant sci., 9, p. 1715.

6. Heidarvand, L. & Amiri, R.M. (2010). What happens in plant molecular responses to cold stress? Acta Physiol. Plant., 32 (3), pp. 419-431.

7. Yamori, W., Noguchi, K., Hikosaka, K. & Terashima, I. (2010). Phenotypic plasticity in photosynthetic temperature acclimation among crop species with different cold tolerances. Plant Physiol., 152, pp. 388-399.

8. Yamasaki, T., Yamakawa, T., Yamane, Y., Koike, H., Satoh, K. & Katoh, S. (2002). Temperature acclimation of photosynthesis and related changes in photosystem II electron transport in winter wheat. Plant Physiol., 128, No. 3, pp. 1087-1097.

9. Way, D.A. & Yamori, W. (2014). Thermal acclimation of photosynthesis: on the importance of adjusting our definitions and accounting for thermal acclimation of respiration. Photosynth. Res., 119, pp. 89-100.

10. Ikkonen, E.N., Shibaeva, T.G. & Titov, A.F. (2015). Response of the photosynthetic apparatus in cucumber leaves to daily short-term temperature drops. Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 62 (4), pp. 494-498.

11. Graham, D. & Patterson, B.D. (1982). Responses of plants to low, nonfreezing temperatures: proteins, metabolism, and acclimation. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 33(1), pp. 347-372.

12. Lyons, J. (Ed.). (2012). Low temperature stress in crop plants: the role of the membrane. Elsevier.

13. Barber, J., Ford, R.C., Mitchell, R.A.C. & Millner, P.A. (1984). Chloroplast thylakoid membrane fluidity and its sensitivity to temperature. Planta, 161, No. 4, pp. 375-380.

14. Millner, P.A. & Barber, J. (1984). Plastoquinone as a mobile redox carrier in the photosynthetic membrane. FEBS lett., 169, pp. 1-6.

15. Shibaeva, T.G., Sherudilo, E.G. & Titov, A.F. (2018). Response of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) Plants to Prolonged Permanent and Short-Term Daily Exposures to Chilling Temperature. Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 65(2), pp. 286-294.

16. Kukresh, L.V., Kulaeva, R.A., Lukashevich, N.P. & Khodortsov, I.R. (1989). Cereals and pulses in intensive agriculture. Minsk: Urajay, 1989 [in Russian].

17. Hall, D. O. (1972). Nomenclature for isolated chloroplasts. Nature New Biol., 235(56), pp. 125-126.

18. Zolotareva, E.K., Tereshchenko, A.F., Dovbysh, E.F. & Onoiko, E.B. (1997). Effect of Alcohols on Inhibition of Photophosphorylation and Electron Transport by N, N'-Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide in Pea Chloroplasts. Biochemistry, 62, pp. 631-635.

19. Arnon, D.I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 24, pp. 1-154.

20. Ewy, R.G. & Dilley, R.A. (2000). Distinguishing between luminal and localized proton buffering pools in thylakoid membranes. Plant Physiol., 122, pp. 583-596.

21. Polishchuk, A.V., Podorvanov, V.V. & Zolotareva, E.K. (2006). pH-dependent regulation of photosynthetic oxygen evolution in isolated spinach chloroplasts Rep. Nat. Acad. Sci. Ukr., 3, pp. 167-172.

22. Dean, R.L. (2014). Measuring light-dependent proton translocation in isolated thylakoids. J. Lab. Chem. Educ., 2 (3), pp. 33-43. j.jlce.20140203.01

23. Theg, S.M. & Tom, C. (2011). Measurement of the DpH and electric field developed across Arabidopsis thylakoids in the light. In Chloroplast Research in Arabidopsis (pp. 327-341). Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.

24. Mills, J.D. (1986). Photosynthesis Energy Transduction: a Practical Approach (Hipkins, M.F., Baker, N.R., eds) pp. 143-187, IRL Press, Oxford.

25. Hohner, R., Aboukila, A., Kunz, H.H. & Venema, K. (2016). Proton gradients and proton-dependent transport processes in the chloroplast. Front. Plant Sci., 7, p. 218.

26. Pick, U. & Weiss, M. (1988). The mechanism of stimulation of photophosphorylation by amines and by nigericin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics, 934(1), pp. 22-31.

27. Walz, D., Goldstein, L. & Avron, M. (1974). Determination and analysis of the buffer capacity of isolated chloroplasts in the light and in the dark. Eur. J. Biochem., 47, pp. 403-407.

28. Podorvanov, V.V., Polishchuk, A.V. & Zolotareva, E.K. (2007). Effect of copper ions on the light-induced proton transfer in spinach chloroplasts. Biofizika, 52, pp. 1049-1053.

29. Los, D.A., Mironov, K.S. & Allakhverdiev, S.I. (2013). Regulatory role of membrane fluidity in gene expression and physiological functions. Photosynth. Res., 116 (2-3), pp. 489-509.