Fiziol. rast. genet. 2021, vol. 53, no. 2, 160-184, doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2021.02.160

Photosynthesis and productivity: main scientific achievements and innovative developments

Stasik O.O., Kiriziy D.A., Priadki­na G.O

  • Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 31/17 Vasylkivska St., Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine

Photosynthesis is the basis of the production process of plants, thus the study of the structure of the photosynthetic apparatus and the mechanisms of its functioning and regulation are important for unveiling ways to increase crop productivity. The paper summarizes the results of research by scientists of the Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics (IPPG) of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in the global context of studying the role of photosynthesis in the production process and the formation of crop yields. The importance of the early period of research in the formation of methodological bases for studying the plant photosynthesis at laboratory and field conditions as well as taking into account its interaction with growth and development, mineral nutrition, etc. is emphasized; this laid the foundations of the national scientific school of physiology, biochemistry and ecology of photosynthesis. The results of main research and innovative developments, awarded by the State Prizes of USSR and Ukrainian SSR, as well as the Prizes M.G. Kholodny of NAS of Ukraine are presented. Scientists of IPPG NAS of Ukraine comprehensively characterized the structural and functional features of the photosynthetic apparatus at the levels of organization from subcellular to coenotic, and mechanisms of regulation in the sink-source system of plants in modern winter wheat varieties, and identified traits that can serve as physiological markers of productivity and drought-tolerance. It is established that high productivity of modern winter wheat varieties is related to prolonged duration of leaves assimilation apparatus during reproductive vegetation, increased photosynthesis activity and efficiency of solar radiation use at leaf and canopy levels, as well as improved stem depositing ability for water soluble carbohydrates. Based on the obtained results, the concept of autoregulation of photosynthesis and the strategy of assimilate distribution in the sink-source system of plants as factors of optimizing the functioning of the photosynthetic apparatus and increasing yield are formulated and developed. The results of research conducted in IPPG show that further genetic improvement of new varieties of winter wheat can come about through the increase in activity of the photosynthetic apparatus at the leaf and canopy levels in the close connection with optimizing growth and ontogenetic dynamics of biomass distribution in whole plant.

Keywords: photosynthesis, photorespiration, Rubisco, source-sink relations, light energy use efficiency, productivity, wheat

Fiziol. rast. genet.
2021, vol. 53, no. 2, 160-184

Full text and supplemented materials

Free full text: PDF  

References

1. FAO. How to feed the world in 2050. 2009: http://www.fao.org.

2. Crist, E., Mora, C. & Engelman, R. (2017). The interaction of human population, food production, and biodiversity protection. Science, 356, pp. 260-264. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal2011

3. Morgun, V.V. & Pryadkina, G.A. (2014). The efficiency of photosynthesis and the prospects for increasing the productivity of winter wheat. Fiziol. rast. genet., 46, No. 4, pp. 279-301 [in Russian].

4. Stewart, B.A. & Lal, R. (2018). Increasing world average yields of cereal crops: it's all about water. Advances in Agronomy, 151, pp. 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2018.05.001

5. Ray, D.K., Ramankutty, N., Mueller, N.D., West, P.C. & Foley, J.A. (2012). Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nature Communications, 3, number article: 1293. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2296

6. Elbehri, A., Challinor, A., Verchot, L., Angelsen, A., Hess, T., Ouled Belgacem, A., Clark, H., Badraoui, M., Cowie, A., De Silva, S., Erickson, J., Joar Hegland, S., Iglesias, A., Inouye, D., Jarvis, A., Mansur, E., Mirzabaev, A., Montanarella, L., Murdiyarso, D., Notenbaert, A., Obersteiner, M., Paustian, K., Pennock, D., Reisinger, A., Soto, D., Soussana, J.-F., Thomas, R., Vargas, R., Van Wijk, M. & Walker, R. (2017). FAO-IPCC expert meeting in climate change, land use and food security: final meeting report. January 23-25, 2017. FAO HQ Rome. FAO and IPCC.

7. Hochman, Z., Gobbett, D.L. & Horan, H. (2017). Climate trends account for stalled wheat yields in Australia since 1990. Global Change Biology, 23, pp. 2071-2081. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13604

8. Evans, J.R. & Lawson, T. (2020). From green to gold: agricultural revolution for food security. J. Exp. Bot., 71, No. 7, pp. 2211-2215. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa110

9. Morgun, V.V. & Kiriziy, D.A. (2012). Prospects and modern strategies of wheat physiological traits improvement for increasing productivity. Physiol. biochem. cult. plants, 44 (6), pp. 463-483 [in Ukrainian].

10. Morgun, V.V. & Rybalka, O.I. (2017). Strategy of genetic improvement of cereals for the purpose of food safety, medical and preventive nutrition and needs of the processing industry. Visnyk NAN Ukrayiny, 3, pp. 54-64 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2017.03.054

11. Furbank, R.T., Jimenez-Berni, J.A., George-Jaeggli, B., Potgieter, A.B. & Deery, D.M. (2019). Field crop phenomics: enabling breeding for radiation use efficiency and biomass in cereal crops. New Phytologist, 223, pp. 1714-1727. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15817

12. Reynolds, M., Bonnett, D., Chapman, S.C., Furbank, R.T., Manes, Y., Mather, D.E. & Parry, M.A.J. (2011). Raising yield potential of wheat. I. Overview of a consortium approach and breeding strategies. J. Exp. Bot., 62, No. 2, pp. 439-452. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq311

13. Reynolds, M.P., Foulkes, J., Furbank, R., Griffiths, S., King, J., Murchie, E., Parry, M. & Slafer, G. (2012). Achieving yield gains in wheat. Plant Cell Environ., 35, No. 10, pp. 1799-1823. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02588.x

14. Furbank, R.T., Sharwood, R., Estavillo, G.M., Silva-Perez, V. & Condon, A.G. (2020). Photons to food: genetic improvement of cereal crop photosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot., 71, No. 7, pp. 2226-2238. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa077

15. Zhu, X.-G. (2010). Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol., 61, pp. 235-261. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112206

16. Carmo-Silva, E., Scales, J.C., Madgwick, P.J. & Parry, M.A. (2015). Optimising Rubisco and its regulation for greater resource use efficiency. Plant Cell Environ., 38, No. 9, pp. 1817-1832. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12425

17. Ort, D.R., Merchant, S.S., Alric, J., Barkan, A., Blankenship, R.E., Bock, R., Croce, R., Hanson, M.R., Hibberd, J.M., Long, S.P., Moore, T.A., Moroney, J., Niyogi, K.K., Parry, M.A., Peralta-Yahya, P.P., Prince, R.C., Redding, K.E., Spalding, M.H., van Wijk, K.J., Vermaas, W.F., von Caemmerer, S., Weber, A.P., Yeates, T.O., Yuan, J.S. & Zhu, X.G. (2015). Redesigning photosynthesis to sustainably meet global food and bioenergy demand. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, No. 28, pp. 8529-8536. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1424031112

18. Simkin, A.J., Lopez-Calcagno, P.E. & Raines, C.A. (2019). Feeding the world: improving photosynthetic efficiency for sustainable crop production photosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot., 70, No. 4, pp. 1119-1140. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery445

19. Paul, M.J., Watson, A. & Griffiths, C.A. (2020). Linking fundamental science to crop improvement through understanding source and sink traits and their integration for yield enhancement. J. Exp. Bot., 71, No. 7, pp. 2270-2280. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz480

20. Gulyaev, B.I., Ilyashuk, E.M. & Mitrofanov, B.A. (1983). Photosynthesis and production process. Kiev: Nauk. dumka [in Russian].

21. Gulyaev, B.I., Rozhko, I.I., Rogachenko, A.D. & Mitrofanov, B.A. (1989). Photosynthesis, production process and plant productivity. Kiev: Naukova dumka [in Russian].

22. Okanenko, A.S. (1923). On the question of the amount of chlorophyll in sugar beet and its significance. Byulleten sortovogo semennogo upravleniya Sakharotresta, No. 6, pp. 49-75 [in Russian].

23. Okanenko, A.S. (1954). Photosynthesis and yield. Kiev: AN URSR [in Russian].

24. Shadchina, T.M., Gulyaev, B.I., Kiriziy, D.A., Stasik, O.O., Pryadkina, G.O. & Storozhenko, V.O. (2006). Regulation of photosynthesis and productivity of plants. Physiological and ecological aspects. Kyiv: Ukrainian Phytosociological Center [in Ukrainian].

25. Kiriziy, D.A., Stasik, O.O., Pryadkina, G.A. & Shadchina, T.M. (2014). Photosynthesis. Vol. 2. Assimilation of CO2 and the mechanisms of its regulation. Kyiv: Logos [in Russian].

26. Parry, M.A.J., Andralojc, P.J., Scales, J.C., Salvucci, M.E., Carmo-Silva, A.E., Alonso, H. & Whitney, S.M. (2013). Rubisco activity and regulation as a targets for crop improvement. J. Exp. Bot., 64, No. 3, pp. 717-730. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers336

27. Tcherkez, G. (2013). Modelling the reaction mechanism of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenese and consequences for kinetic parameters. Plant Cell Environ., 36, No. 9, pp. 1586-1596. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12066

28. Flamholz, A.I., Prywes, N., Moran, U., Davidi, D., Bar-On, Y.M., Oltrogge, L.M., Alves, R., Savage, D. & Milo, R. (2019). Revisiting trade-offs between rubisco kinetic parameters. Biochemistry, 58, pp. 3365-3376. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00237

29. Suzuki, Yu., Ohkubo, M., Hatakeyama, H., Ohashi, K., Yoshizawa, R., Kojima, S., Hayakawa, T., Yamaya, T., Mae, T. & Makino, A. (2007). Increased Rubisco content in transgenic rice transformed with the 'sense' rbcS gene. Plant Cell Physiol., 48, No. 4, pp. 626-637. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcm035

30. Suzuki, Yu., Fujimori, T., Kanno, K., Sasaki, A., Ohashi, Y. & Makino, A. (2012). Metabolome analysis of photosynthesis and the related primary metabolites in the leaves of transgenic rice plants with increased and decreased Rubisco content. Plant Cell Environ., 35, No. 8, pp. 1369-1379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02494.x

31. Stasik, O.O. (2007). Analysis of internal factors of intergenotypic variability of photosynthesis intensity in the genus Triticum according to gasometric studies. Physiology and biochemistry cult. plants, 39, No. 6, pp. 488-495 [in Ukrainian].

32. Stasik, O.O. (2008). Limiting factors of CO2 photosynthetic assimilation in two contrasting yield varieties of winter wheat. Visnyk Ukr. Tov-va henetykiv i selektsioneriv, 6, No. 1, pp. 145-149 [in Ukrainian].

33. Kiriziy, D.A., Shadchyna, T.M., Stasyk, O.O., Pryadkina, G.O., Sokolovska-Sergiienko, O.G., Gulyaev, B.I. & Sytnyk, S.K. (2011). Peculiarities of photosynthesis and production process in high-intensity genotypes of winter wheat. Kyiv: Osnova [in Ukrainian].

34. Theobald, J.C., Mitchel, R.A.C., Parry, M.A.J. & Lawlor, D.W. (1998). Estimating the excess investment in ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenese in leaves of spring wheat grown under elevated CO2. Plant Physiol., 118, No. 3, pp. 945-955. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.118.3.945

35. Galmes, J., Capo-Bauca, S., Niinemets, U. & Iniguez, C. (2019). Potential improvement of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in crops by exploiting the natural variation in the temperature response of Rubisco catalytic traits. Current Opinion in Plant Biol., 49, pp. 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2019.05.002

36. Tcherkez, G.G.B., Farquhar, G.D. & Andrews, T.J. (2006). Despite slow catalysis and confused substrate specificity, all ribulose bisphosphate carboxylases may be nearly perfectly optimized. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, No. 19, pp. 7246-7251. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600605103

37. Zhu, X.-G., Portis, A.R.Jr. & Long, S.P. (2004). Would transformation of C3 crop plants with foreign Rubisco increase productivity? A computational analysis extrapolating from kinetic properties to canopy photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ., 27, No. 1, pp. 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2004.01142.x

38. Weber, A.P.M. & Bar-Even, A. (2019). Update: improving the efficiency of photosynthetic carbon reactions. Plant Physiol., 179, pp. 803-812. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.01521

39. Walker, B.J., VanLoocke, A., Bernacchi, C.J. & Ort, D.R. (2016). The costs of photorespiration to food production now and in the future. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 67, pp. 107-129. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111709

40. Somerville, C.R. (2001). An early Arabidopsis demonstration. Resolving a few issues concerning photorespiration. Plant Physiol., 125, No. 1, pp. 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.125.1.20

41. Stasik, O.O. (2014). Photorespiration: Metabolism and the Physiological Role. In Modern Photosynthetic Problems. Vol. 2 (pp. 505-535), Moskow-Izhevsk: Institute for Computer Research [in Russian].

42. Timm, S. & Arrivault, S. (2021). Regulation of central carbon and amino acid metabolism in plants. Plants, 10, p. 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10030430

43. Stasik, O.O. (2009). The role of photorespiration in the regulation of photosynthesis, productivity and resistance of plants to abiotic stresses (Extended abstract of Doctor thesis). Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, Kyiv, Ukraine [in Ukrainian].

44. Stasik, O. & Jones, H.G. (2007). Response of photosynthetic apparatus to moderate high temperature in contrasting wheat cultivars at different oxygen concentrations. J. Exp. Bot., 58, No. 8, pp. 2133-2143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm067

45. Timm, S. (2021). The impact of photorespiration on plant primary metabolism through metabolic and redox regulation. Biochem. Soc. Trans., 48, No. 6, pp. 2495-2504. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20200055

46. Kiriziy, D.A. (2004). Photosynthesis and plant growth in terms of source-sink relationships. Kiev: Logos [in Russian].

47. Kiriziy, D.A. (2015). Photosynthesis and source-sink relations as a component of the wheat production process. Fiziol. rast. genet., 47, No. 5, pp. 393-419 [in Russian].

48. Fischer, R.A. (2008). The importance of grain or kernel number in wheat: A reply to Sinclair and Jamieson. Field Crops Res., 105, No. 1-2, pp. 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.04.002

49. Ehdaie, B., Alloush, G.A. & Waines, J.G. (2008). Genotypic variation in linear rate of grain growth and contribution of stem reserves to grain yield in wheat. Field Crops Res., 106, No. 1, pp. 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.10.012

50. Robinson, S., Warburton, K., Seymour, M., Clench, M. & Thomas-Oates, J. (2007). Localization of water-soluble carbohydrates in wheat stems using imaging matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry. New Phytol., 173, No. 2, pp. 438-444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01934.x

51. Madani, A., Shirani-Rad, A., Pazoki, A., Nourmohammadi, G. & Zarghami, R. (2010). Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain filling and dry matter partitioning responses to source:sink modifications under postanthesis water and nitrogen deficiency. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 32, No. 1, pp. 145-151. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v32i1.6273

52. Saint Pierre, C., Trethowan, R. & Reynolds, M. (2010). Stem solidness and its relationship to water-soluble carbohydrates: association with wheat yield under water deficit. Functional Plant Biology, 37, No. 2, pp. 166-174. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09174

53. Morgun, V.V., Priadkina, G.A. & Zborivska, O.V. (2019). Depositing ability of stem of winter wheat varieties of different period of selection. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 10, No. 2, pp. 240-245. https://doi.org/10.15421/021936

54. Pan, J., Zhu, Y. & Cao, W.X. (2007). Modeling plant carbon flow and grain starch accumulation in wheat. Field Crop Res., 101, No. 3, pp. 276-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.12.005

55. Alvaro, F., Royo, C., del Moral, L.F. & Villegas, D. (2008). Grain filling and dry matter translocation responses to sousce-sink modifications in a historical series of durum wheat. Crop Sci., 48, No. 4, pp. 1523-1531. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.10.0545

56. Morgun, V.V., Priadkina, G.A. & Zborovska, O.V. (2018). Dependence of main shoot ear grain from stem deposited ability of winter wheat varieties. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 8, No. 3, pp. 111-116.

57. Kiriziy, D.A., Frantiychuk, V.V. & Stasik, O.O. (2015). Content of soluble carbohydrates and senescence of wheat flag leaf induced by experimental assimilates outflow interruption. Fiziol. rast. genet., 47, No. 2, pp. 136-146 [in Russian].

58. Kiriziy, D.A. (2013). Photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency in wheat leaves. Physiology and biochemistry cult. plants, 45, No. 4, pp. 296-305 [in Russian].

59. Monteith, J.L. (1977). Climate and efficiency of crop production in Britain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 281, pp. 277-294. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1977.0140

60. Hay, R.K.M. & Porter, J.R. (2006). The Physiology of Crop Yield. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Publishing Company.

61. Slattery, R.A. & Ort, D.R. (2015). Photosynthetic Energy Conversion Efficiency: Setting a Baseline for Gauging Future Improvements in Important Food and Biofuel Crops. Plant Physiol., 168, pp. 383-392. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00066

62. Sinclair, T.R. (2013). Transpiration: Moving from semi-empirical approaches to first principles. Proceedings of the Symposium Improving tools to assess climate change effects on crop response: Modeling approaches and applications (4 November 2013), Madison.

63. Reynolds, M., Foulkes, M.J., Slafer, G.A., Berry, P., Parry, M.A.J., Snape, J.W. & Angus, W.J. (2009). Raising yield potential in wheat. J. Exp. Bot., 60, No. 7, pp. 1899-1918. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp016

64. Pradhan, S., Sehgal, V.K., Bandyopadhyay, K.K., Panigrahi, P., Parihar, C.M. & Jat, S.L. (2018). Radiation interception, extinction coefficient and use efficiency of wheat crop at various irrigation and nitrogen levels in a semi-arid location. Indian J. Plant Physiol., 23, No. 3, pp. 416-425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-018-0400-x

65. Priadkina, G.O., Stasik, O.O., Kapitanska, O.S., Yarmolska, O.E. & Tsukrenko, N.V. (2019). Efficiency of use of photosynthetically active radiation in winter wheat crops. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu, No. 1, pp. 23-34 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.35550/vbio2019.01.023

66. Chen, Y.H., Yu, S.L. & Yu, Z.W. (2003). Relationship between amount or distribution of PAR interception and grain output of wheat communities. Acta Agron. Sinica, 29, pp. 730-734.

67. Li, Q.Q., Chen, Y.H., Liu, M.Y., Xunbo, Z., Songlie, Y. & Baodi, D. (2008). Effect of irrigation and planting patterns on radiation use efficiency and yield of winter wheat in North China. Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, 95 (4), pp. 469-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.11.010

68. Lollato, R.P. & Edwards, J.T. (2015). Maximum Attainable Wheat Yield and Resource-Use Efficiency in the Southern Great Plains. Crop Sci., 55, pp. 2863-2876. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.04.0215

69. Priadkina, G.A. (2012). Solar radiation use efficiency in two winter wheat varieties with contrasting grain productivity. Zemledeliye i selektsiya v Belarusi, 48, pp. 265-270 [in Russian].

70. Shearman, V.J., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Scott, R.K. & Foulkes, M.J. (2005). Physiological Processes Associated with Wheat Yield Progress in the UK. Crop Sci., 45, pp. 175-185. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0175

71. Chaudhary, J.L., Patel, S.R., Verma, P.K., Manikandan, N. & Khavse, R. (2016). Thermal and radiation effect studies of different wheat varieties in Chhattisgarh plains zone under rice-wheat cropping system. Mausam, 67, pp. 677-682.

72. Awal, M.A., Amin, M.R., Rhaman, M.S., Shelley, I.J. & Rahman, M.Sh. (2017). Canopy Characters and Light-Use Efficiency of Some Modern Wheat Varieties. Bangladesh. J. Agriculture and Ecology Research International, 11, No. 1, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.9734/JAERI/2017/31744

73. Rawashdeh, H. & Sala, F. (2014). Influence of iron foliar fertilization on some growth and physiological parameters of wheat at two growth stages. Scientific Papers. Series A. Agronomy, LVII, pp. 306-309.

74. Amirani, D.Sh. & Kasraei, P. (2015). The effect of foliar application of microelements on phenological and physiological characteristics of Mung bean under drought stress. Int. J. Agron. and Agric. Research, 7, pp. 1-8.

75. Jung, S., Faust, F.E. & Schubert, S. (2017). Limiting physiological processes for maize growth under Mg deficiency. Proceedings of the XVIII International Plant Nutrition Colloquium (pp. 227-228), Copenhagen.

76. Verbruggen, N. & Hermans, Ch. (2013). Physiological and molecular responses to magnesium nutritional imbalance in plants. Plant Soil, 368, pp. 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1589-0

77. Ma, D., Sun, D., Wang, Ch., Ding, H., Qin, H., Hou, J., Ding, H., Qin, H., Hou, J., Huang, X., Xie, Y. & Guo, T. (2017). Physiological responses and yield of wheat plants in Zinc-mediated alleviation of drought stress. Front Plant Sci., 8, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00860

78. Tao, Zh.-q., Wang, D.-m., Ma, Sh.-k., Yang, Y.-sh., Zhao, G.-c. & Chang, X.-H. (2018). Light interception and radiation use efficiency response to tridimensional uniform sowing in winter wheat. J. Integrative Agriculture, 17, pp. 566-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61715-5

79. Priadkina, G.A., Stasik, O.O., Polevoy, A.N., Yarmolskaya, E.E. & Kuzmova, K. (2020). Radiation use efficiency of winter wheat canopy during vegetative growth. Fiziol. rast. genet., 52, No. 3, pp. 208-223. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2020.03.208

80. Cabrera-Bosquet, L., Fournier, C., Brichet, N., Welcker, C., Suard, B. & Tardieu, F. (2016). High-throughput estimation of incident light, light interception and radiation-use efficiency of thousands of plants in a phenotyping platform. New Phytologist, 212, No. 1, pp. 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14027

82. Leonelli, L., Erickson, E., Lyska, D. & Niyogi, K.K. (2016). Transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana for rapid functional analysis of genes involved in non-photochemical quenching and carotenoid biosynthesis. Plant J., 88, No. 3, pp. 375-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13268

83. Furbank, R.T., Quick, P.W. & Sirault, X.R.R. (2015). Improving photosynthesis and yield potential in cereal crops by targeted genetic manipulation: Prospects, progress and challenges. Field Crop Res., 182, pp. 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.04.009

84. Ambavaram, M.M.R., Ali, A., Ryan, K.P., Peoples, O., Shell, K.D. & Somleva, M.N. (2018). Novel transcription factors PvBMY1 and PvBMY3 increase biomass yield in greenhouse-grown switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Plant Sci., 273, pp. 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.04.003

85. Priadkina, G.A. (2009). Features of the reaction of xanthophylls of the violaxanthin cycle to soil drought in two varieties of winter wheat with contrasting grain productivity. Trudy Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Vol. 4, Pt. 2, pp. 209-215 [in Russian].

86. Priadkina, G.O. (2011). Peculiarities of violaxanthin cycle functioning in leaves of winter wheat varieties contrasting in productivity. Physiology and biochemistry of cultivated plants, 43, No. 1, pp. 65-71 [in Ukrainian].

87. Priadkina, G.A. (2012). Changes in the donor-acceptor balance and de-epoxidation of pigments in the violaxanthin cycle of the flag leaf of winter wheat. Physiology and biochemistry of cultivated plants, 44, No. 1, pp. 58-63 [in Russian].

88. Niyogi, K.K. (1999). Photoprotection revisited: genetic and molecular approaches. Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol., 50, pp. 333-359. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.333

89. Priadkina, G.O. (2013). Photosynthetic pigments, solar radiation use efficiency and plant productivity in agrocenoses (Extended abstract of Doctor thesis). Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, Kyiv, Ukraine [in Ukrainian].