Fiziol. rast. genet. 2020, vol. 52, no. 6, 507-517, doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2020.06.507

Phosphate and phosphite: influence on the state of wheat photosynthetic apparatus

Kovalyshyn I.B., Shevchenko V.V.

  • Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
    31/17 Vasylkivska St., Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine

In order to determine the peculiarities of phosphate (PO43–) and phosphite (PO33–) effect on the state of wheat plants photosynthetic apparatus method of chlorophyll fluorescence induction (СhFI) was used. The experiment was performed on bread wheat Triticum aestivum Zymoiarka variety with application of monopotassium phosphate (23 % P in PO43– form) and Quantum Phytophos (11 % P: 5.5 % in РО33– form, 5.5 % in РО43– form). The plants were sprayed with an aqueous solution of fertilizers at the end of the earing phase (BBCH 59). IFH parameters were measured on a flag leaf for 14 days after treatment of plants with fertilizers. According to the СhFI parameters registration, the values of variable fluorescence Fv and Fv/Fm in dark-adapted leaves were calculated to assess the photochemical activity of photosystem II (PhS II), and the fluorescence decrease index of chlorophyll during the slow phase of the induction curve, RFd, which characterizes the activity of CO2 assimilation processes was calculated. It was found that the photochemical activity of PS II and the RFd index in control plants decreased significantly due to ontogenetic leaf aging and influence of adverse environmental factors, in particular the increase in temperature at the background of low humidity. Foliar application of phosphorus fertilizers helped to maintain Fv index stability during almost the entire study period, and a smaller decrease in the photochemical activity of PS II and the RFd index during ontogenesis and elevated temperature influence. The smallest decrease in indices of photosynthetic apparatus activity was recorded in plants sprayed with a combined fertilizer Quantum-Phytophos, containing phosphate and phosphite. The results show that phosphorus-containing fertilizers foliar application helps to maintain the activity of photosynthetic apparatus and slow the aging process during reproductive development of wheat plants, and the inclusion of phosphite in their composition significantly enhances the positive effect.

Keywords: Triticum aestivum L., phosphorus-containing fertilizers, foliar fertilization, induction of chlorophyll fluorescence

Fiziol. rast. genet.
2020, vol. 52, no. 6, 507-517

Full text and supplemented materials

Free full text: PDF  

References

1. Sajyan, T.K., Shaban, N., Rizkallah, J. & Sassine, Y.N. (2018). Effects of Monopotassium-phosphate, Nano-calcium fertilizer, Acetyl salicylic acid and glycinebetaine application on growth and production of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) crop under salt stress. Agronomy Research, 16, No. 3, pp. 872-883. https://doi.org/10.15159/ar.18.079

2. Lv, X., Han, J., Liao, Y. & Liu, Y. (2017). Effect of phosphorus and potassium foliage application post-anthesis on grain filling and hormonal changes of wheat. Field Crops Research, 214, pp. 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.09.001

3. Froese, S., Wiens, J. T., Warkentin, T. D. & Schoenau, J. J. (2020). Response of Canola, Wheat and Pea to foliar phosphorus fertilization at a phosphorus deficient site in eastern Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, Ja, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2019-0276

4. Zhan, X., Liu, W., Hou, Y. & Zhang, Sh. (2016). The Influence of Phosphorus Sources on the Growth and Rhizosphere Soil Characteristics of Two Genotypes of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 47 (9), pp. 1078-1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2016.1166236

5. Reynolds, M.P., Pask, A.J.D. & Mullan, D.M. (2012). Physiological breeding I: interdisciplinary approaches to improve crop adaptation. Mexico: CIMMYT, 174 p.

6. Achary, V.M.M., Ram, B., Manna, M., Datta, D., Bhatt, A., Reddy, M.K. & Agrawal, P.K. (2017). Phosphite: a novel P fertilizer for weed management and pathogen control. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 15 (12), pp. 1493-1508. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12803

7. Gomez-Merino, F.C. & Trejo-Tellez, L.I. (2016). Conventional and novel uses of phosphite in horticulture: potentialities and challenges. Italus Hortus, 23 (2), pp. 1-13.

8. Rossall, S., Qing, C., Paneri, M., Bennett, M. & Swarup, R. (2016). A «growing» role for phosphites in promoting plant growth and development. Acta Horticulturae, 1148, pp. 61-68. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1148.7

9. Martinez, S. (2016). Effects of combined application of potassium phosphite and fungicide on stem and sheath disease control, yield, and quality of rice. Crop Protection, 89, pp. 259-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.08.002

10. Zambrosi, F.C., Mesquita, G.L., Menino, G., Tanaka, F.A., Mattos, D. & Quaggio, J.A. (2017). Anatomical and ultrastructural damage to citrus leaves from phosphite spray depends on phosphorus supply to roots. Plant and soil, 418 (1-2), pp. 557-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3314-x

11. Vinas, M., Mendez, J.C. & Jimenez, V.M. (2020). Effect of foliar applications of phosphites on growth, nutritional status and defense responses in tomato plants. Scientia Horticulturae, 265, 109200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109200

12. Zambrosi, F.C. (2019). Foliar Phosphorus Applications in the Forms of Phosphate and Phosphite Have Contrasting Effects on Wheat Performance Under Field Conditions. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 22 (5), pp. 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-017-0060-0

13. Bachiega Zambrosi, F.C. (2016). Phosphite and phosphate have contrasting effects on nutrient status of plants. Journal of Crop Improvement, 30 (4), pp. 421-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2016.1173611

14. Song, L., Guanter, L., Guan, K., You, L., Huete, A., Ju, W. & Zhang, Y. (2018). Satellite sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence detects early response of winter wheat to heat stress in the Indian Indo-Gangetic Plains. Global Change Biology, 24 (9), pp. 4023-4037. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14302

15. Liu, L., Yang, X., Zhou, H., Liu, S., Zhou, L., Li, X., Yang, J., Han, X. & Wu, J. (2018). Evaluating the utility of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence for drought monitoring by comparison with NDVI derived from wheat canopy. Science of the Total Environment, 625, pp. 1208-1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.268

16. Gao, M., Qi, Y., Song, W. & Xu, H. (2016). Effects of di-n-butyl phthalate and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate on the growth, photosynthesis, and chlorophyll fluorescence of wheat seedlings. Chemosphere, 151, pp. 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.061

17. Korneev, D.Yu. (2002). Information capabilities of chlorophyll fluorescence induction method. Kyiv: Alterpres [in Russian].

18. Wang, X., Wang, L. & Shangguan, Z. (2016). Leaf Gas Exchange and Fluorescence of Two Winter Wheat Varieties in Response to Drought Stress and Nitrogen Supply. PLoS One, 11 (11), e0165733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165733

19. Romanov, V.O., Braiko, Y.O., Imamutdinova, R.G., Fedak, V.S., Sarakhan, E.V. (Eds.). (2013). Portable fluorometer «Floratest». Operating instructions. Kyiv: V.M. Glushkov Institute of Cybernetics of the NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].

20. Lichtenthaler, H. K., Buschmann, C. & Knapp, M. (2005). How to correctly determine the different chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and the chlorophyll fluorescence decrease ratio RFd of leaves with the PAM fluorometer. Photosynthetica, 43 (3), pp. 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-005-0062-6

21. RP5. Weather archive in Kyiv / Zhulyany (airport). Retrived from https://rp5.ua (2020, October, 05)

22. Shevchenko, V.V. & Bondarenko, O.Yu. (2017). Study of thermal resistance of the photosynthesic apparatus in winter wheat varieties with different sensitivity to elevated temperatures. Biologichni Studiyi, 3-4, pp. 78-79 [in Ukrainian].

23. Kochubei, S.M., Bondarenko, O.Yu. & Shevchenko, V.V. (2014). Photosynthesis: structural organization and functional features of the light phase of photosynthesis. 1. Kiev: Logos [in Russian].

24. Morgun, V.V., Stasik, O.O., Kiriziy, D.A. & Pryadkina, G.O. (2016). Relations between reactions of photosynthetic traits and grain productivity on soil drought in winter wheat varieties contrasting in their tolerance. Fiziol. rast. genet., 48, No. 5, pp. 371-381 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2016.05.371

25. Polishchuk, O.V. (2017). Methods in laboratory and field research of chlorophyll fluorescence. Ukr. Bot. J., 74 (1), pp. 86-93 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj74.01.086

26. Lysenko, V.S., Varduni, T.V., Sawyer, V.G. & Krasnov, V.P. (2013). Chlorophyll fluorescence of plants as an indicator of environmental stress: theoretical foundations of the method. Fundam. Issledovaniya, 4 (1), pp. 112-120 [in Ukrainian].

27. Patyka, V.P., Huliaieva, H.B., Bohdan, M.M., Tokovenko, I.P., Pasichnyk, L.A., Patyka, M.V., Maksin, V.I. & Kaplunenko, V.G. (2019). Phytohormone ratio and photosynthetic activity of bread whear plants under the effect of bioactive substances. Fiziol. rast. genet., 51, No. 2, pp. 133-146 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2019.02.133